Model Interpretability for Marine Computer Vision

6. Model Interpretability for Marine Computer Vision#

6.1. Overview#

In this section, we will explore the importance of model interpretability in marine computer vision applications. As computer vision models become increasingly complex, understanding why they make certain predictions is crucial for scientific validation, trust building, and identifying biases unique to marine imagery.

6.1.1. Learning Objectives#

By the end of this section, you will:

  • Understand what model interpretability is and why it matters for marine science

  • Learn about different techniques to visualize and understand model decisions

  • Identify common pitfalls in model interpretation specific to underwater imagery

  • Apply best practices for explainable AI in marine research contexts

6.2. What is Model Interpretability?#

Model interpretability, or explainable AI (XAI), refers to methods and techniques that help humans understand how machine learning models make decisions. For marine computer vision, this means being able to understand why a model classifies an organism as one species rather than another, or why it detects certain features in underwater imagery.

Interpretability serves several critical functions in scientific applications:

  1. Scientific Validation: Ensuring that models are making predictions based on meaningful patterns rather than artifacts

  2. Knowledge Discovery: Revealing new patterns or relationships in marine data that might inform scientific understanding

  3. Error Diagnosis: Identifying when and why models make mistakes

  4. Trust Building: Helping marine scientists and stakeholders trust and adopt AI systems

6.3. The Challenge of the “Black Box” in Marine Science#

Deep learning models, particularly convolutional neural networks used in computer vision, are often described as “black boxes” because their internal decision-making processes are not immediately transparent. This opacity presents unique challenges in marine science contexts:

  • Scientific Method Compatibility: The scientific method requires transparency and reproducibility, which can be at odds with black-box models

  • Domain Expertise Integration: Marine scientists possess valuable knowledge that should inform and validate model interpretations

  • Policy and Management Implications: When CV models inform conservation decisions or resource management, explainability becomes ethically necessary

6.4. Visualization Techniques for Understanding Marine CV Models#

Several techniques can help visualize what features marine CV models are focusing on:

6.4.1. Class Activation Mapping (CAM) and Grad-CAM#

Class Activation Mapping highlights the regions of an image that most influenced a model’s classification decision.

Gradient-weighted Class Activation Mapping (Grad-CAM) uses the gradients flowing into the final convolutional layer to produce a coarse localization map of important regions in the image.

For marine applications, Grad-CAM can reveal whether a model is:

  • Focusing on actual taxonomic features of a marine organism

  • Being misled by background elements (like substrate or habitat features)

  • Relying on artifacts such as lighting inconsistencies or measurement devices visible in the frame

6.4.2. Feature Visualization#

Feature visualization techniques generate images that maximize the activation of specific neurons in a neural network. For marine CV models, these visualizations can reveal:

  • What patterns different layers are detecting (e.g., edges, textures, or higher-level structures)

  • Whether the model has learned meaningful representations of marine organisms and environments

  • If the model is sensitive to features that human experts would consider taxonomically relevant

6.4.3. LIME and SHAP for Local Explanations#

Local Interpretable Model-agnostic Explanations (LIME) and SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) provide ways to explain individual predictions:

  • LIME creates a simpler, interpretable model around a single prediction

  • SHAP assigns importance values to each feature based on game theory principles

These approaches can be particularly valuable for analyzing challenging marine imagery cases where identifications are difficult or unusual.

6.5. Common Pitfalls in Marine Model Interpretation#

When interpreting marine CV models, researchers should be aware of several common pitfalls:

6.5.1. Spurious Correlations in Marine Imagery#

Marine organisms often appear in specific habitats or contexts. Models may learn to associate species with these contexts rather than with the organisms’ actual distinguishing features.

For example, a model might “learn” that:

  • Species A appears primarily over sandy substrates

  • Species B is typically photographed in deeper, darker waters

  • Species C is often found near measurement scales or reference objects

Interpretability techniques can reveal when models are relying on these contextual clues rather than taxonomically relevant features.

6.5.2. Lighting and Water Quality Artifacts#

Underwater imagery presents unique challenges due to:

  • Varying light attenuation with depth and water conditions

  • Color distortion that changes with distance and water properties

  • Particulates and marine snow that create noise in images

Model interpretation can help identify when these factors are influencing predictions inappropriately.

6.5.3. Scale and Perspective Issues#

Marine organisms may appear at various scales and angles in imagery, especially when comparing data collected through different methods (e.g., ROV vs. AUV vs. diver-operated cameras).

Interpretability methods can reveal whether models are invariant to these differences or if they’re making predictions based on size or perspective rather than intrinsic features.

6.6. Best Practices for Explainable Marine CV#

6.6.1. 1. Integrate Domain Knowledge Early#

Work with marine biologists and taxonomists to:

  • Identify which features should be relevant for classification

  • Validate that model attention aligns with expert attention

  • Develop explanation methods that match domain-specific needs

6.6.2. 2. Document Interpretation Alongside Results#

When publishing or deploying marine CV models:

  • Include visualizations of what features influenced key predictions

  • Discuss both successful interpretations and unexplained behaviors

  • Acknowledge limitations in current interpretability approaches

6.6.3. 3. Use Multiple Interpretation Methods#

No single interpretability method is perfect. Combine approaches like:

  • Grad-CAM for spatial attention visualization

  • Feature visualization for understanding learned representations

Contents